毫不费力
读者会读完:多半是 · 行话密度:通篇大白话
发出去之前,对这份初稿的九项解读。
读者会读完:多半是 · 行话密度:通篇大白话
发出去之前,对这份初稿的九项解读。
你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我
第一次读的人知不知道它在说什么。
每段里的流行词数量。
唯一重要的参与度指标。
具体主张对抗抽象说辞。
这段文字假定读者受过多少教育。
读者听到的那把嗓音。
哪里已经奏效了。
删掉也不损失什么的句子。
有没有断言任何可被证伪的东西。
拿到链接的人都能看,并且会出现在「浏览」里。
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"clarity": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How clear is this writing to a first-time reader?",
"criteria": [
"Impenetrable",
"Needs re-reading",
"Followable with effort",
"Clear",
"Effortless"
]
},
"concreteness": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How concrete and specific is this writing?",
"criteria": [
"Pure abstraction, no specifics at all",
"Mostly general claims",
"A mix of specifics and generalities",
"Mostly specific",
"Every claim is grounded in a specific detail"
]
},
"jargon": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How heavy is the jargon and buzzword usage?",
"criteria": [
"Plain language throughout",
"Occasional industry terms",
"Noticeably jargon-heavy",
"Dense with buzzwords",
"Almost entirely buzzwords"
]
},
"reading_level": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "What reading level does this writing assume?",
"criteria": [
"Primary school",
"Middle school",
"High school",
"Undergraduate",
"Specialist or academic"
]
},
"register": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What voice is this written in?",
"criteria": {
"Conversational": "Sounds like a person talking to you",
"Professional": "Polished and neutral",
"Corporate": "Institutional, hedged, committee-written",
"Academic": "Formal, citation-shaped, careful",
"Promotional": "Selling, superlative-heavy"
}
},
"strongest_element": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What is the strongest thing about this draft?",
"criteria": {
"The opening": "It earns the next sentence",
"The structure": "It is easy to navigate and follow",
"The evidence": "Claims are supported by specifics",
"The voice": "It sounds like a person with a point of view",
"The ending": "It lands and tells you what to do",
"Nothing": "No element stands out yet"
}
},
"would_finish": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Would an average reader finish this?",
"criteria": {
"true": "They would read to the end",
"false": "They would stop partway"
}
},
"has_filler": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this contain sentences that could be deleted without losing meaning?"
},
"says_something": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this make a specific claim a reader could disagree with?",
"criteria": {
"true": "It takes a position or states a checkable fact",
"false": "It is unobjectionable and could have been written about anything"
}
}
}
}