危言耸听

POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone

{
  "state": "震惊：科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆，对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。",
  "model": "jev-latest",
  "questions": {
    "framing": {
      "type": "choice",
      "instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
      "criteria": {
        "Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
        "Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
        "Critical": "Argues against the subject",
        "Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
        "Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
        "Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
      }
    },
    "sensationalism": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
      "criteria": [
        "Completely measured",
        "Slightly heightened",
        "Noticeably dramatic",
        "Heavily sensationalised",
        "Pure hype"
      ]
    },
    "evidence_density": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
      "criteria": [
        "No evidence at all",
        "Vague appeals to authority",
        "Some named sources",
        "Specific, checkable claims",
        "Fully sourced and quantified"
      ]
    },
    "is_clickbait": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
        "false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
      }
    },
    "is_opinion": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
    },
    "names_sources": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
        "false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
      }
    },
    "emotional_appeal": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
      "criteria": [
        "None — purely factual",
        "Mild colouring",
        "Clear emotional framing",
        "Emotion carries the argument",
        "Entirely an emotional appeal"
      ]
    },
    "headline_matches_body": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
    },
    "urgency_manufactured": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
    }
  }
}