中立
耸动程度:明显戏剧化 · 标题党:偏向否
一则新闻是被怎么框起来的。
耸动程度:明显戏剧化 · 标题党:偏向否
一则新闻是被怎么框起来的。
认识几个 00 后一年干三千万起步的,还真都是互联网😂干的都是k12 教培 05 年入百万的认识俩 一个干东南亚跨境电商 一个依旧 k12 教培 三四年前还有个 19 岁年入两千万的人才,当时震惊整个国内 k12 数学圈 币圈有个 05 的不说了 至于灰产 24 年十月我曾接触过无人机零配件外贸业务 (虽然零配件外贸出去用途大家都能猜到,但这算灰产吗?) 当时知道三个年轻人,两男一女,没有一个大于二十一岁 他们在珠海航展拉客户做居间,每笔居间费最低五十万起 其中那个女生还撮合了笔香港老板的投资 FA 佣金拿了两百万
文本对其主题所采取的立场。
语言比事实跑出去多远。
标题是不是靠藏着不说来逼你点进去。
每个主张背后有多少具名来源和可核查的事实。
它在论证还是在报道。
「专家称」不算数。
把恐惧、愤怒和希望当作说服手段。
文章有没有兑现它承诺的东西。
明明不限时,却说「就是现在」。
拿到链接的人都能看,并且会出现在「浏览」里。
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "认识几个 00 后一年干三千万起步的,还真都是互联网😂干的都是k12 教培 05 年入百万的认识俩 一个干东南亚跨境电商 一个依旧 k12 教培 三四年前还有个 19 岁年入两千万的人才,当时震惊整个国内 k12 数学圈 币圈有个 05 的不说了 至于灰产 24 年十月我曾接触过无人机零配件外贸业务 (虽然零配件外贸出去用途大家都能猜到,但这算灰产吗?) 当时知道三个年轻人,两男一女,没有一个…",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"framing": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
"criteria": {
"Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
"Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
"Critical": "Argues against the subject",
"Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
"Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
"Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
}
},
"sensationalism": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
"criteria": [
"Completely measured",
"Slightly heightened",
"Noticeably dramatic",
"Heavily sensationalised",
"Pure hype"
]
},
"evidence_density": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
"criteria": [
"No evidence at all",
"Vague appeals to authority",
"Some named sources",
"Specific, checkable claims",
"Fully sourced and quantified"
]
},
"is_clickbait": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
"false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
}
},
"is_opinion": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
},
"names_sources": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
"false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
}
},
"emotional_appeal": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
"criteria": [
"None — purely factual",
"Mild colouring",
"Clear emotional framing",
"Emotion carries the argument",
"Entirely an emotional appeal"
]
},
"headline_matches_body": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
},
"urgency_manufactured": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
}
}
}