Dá para acompanhar com esforço
O leitor terminaria: Genuinamente indeciso · Densidade de jargão: Quase só palavras da moda
Nove leituras de um rascunho, antes de você enviar.
O leitor terminaria: Genuinamente indeciso · Densidade de jargão: Quase só palavras da moda
Nove leituras de um rascunho, antes de você enviar.
我们激动地宣布,本平台现已引入业界领先的 AI 驱动编排层,使各类组织能够在其数据资产版图中释放前所未有的协同效应。借助新一代机器学习的力量,客户可以规模化地驱动变革性成果。欢迎联系我们,了解我们如何在您的数字化旅程中携手同行。
Se quem lê pela primeira vez entende o que está sendo dito.
Palavras da moda por parágrafo.
A única métrica de engajamento que importa.
Afirmações específicas contra abstrações.
Quanta escolaridade o texto pressupõe.
A voz que quem lê ouve.
O que já está funcionando.
Frases que dariam para apagar sem perda.
Se alguma coisa falseável está sendo afirmada.
Qualquer pessoa com o link pode ver, e ela aparece em Explorar.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "我们激动地宣布,本平台现已引入业界领先的 AI 驱动编排层,使各类组织能够在其数据资产版图中释放前所未有的协同效应。借助新一代机器学习的力量,客户可以规模化地驱动变革性成果。欢迎联系我们,了解我们如何在您的数字化旅程中携手同行。",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"clarity": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How clear is this writing to a first-time reader?",
"criteria": [
"Impenetrable",
"Needs re-reading",
"Followable with effort",
"Clear",
"Effortless"
]
},
"concreteness": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How concrete and specific is this writing?",
"criteria": [
"Pure abstraction, no specifics at all",
"Mostly general claims",
"A mix of specifics and generalities",
"Mostly specific",
"Every claim is grounded in a specific detail"
]
},
"jargon": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How heavy is the jargon and buzzword usage?",
"criteria": [
"Plain language throughout",
"Occasional industry terms",
"Noticeably jargon-heavy",
"Dense with buzzwords",
"Almost entirely buzzwords"
]
},
"reading_level": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "What reading level does this writing assume?",
"criteria": [
"Primary school",
"Middle school",
"High school",
"Undergraduate",
"Specialist or academic"
]
},
"register": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What voice is this written in?",
"criteria": {
"Conversational": "Sounds like a person talking to you",
"Professional": "Polished and neutral",
"Corporate": "Institutional, hedged, committee-written",
"Academic": "Formal, citation-shaped, careful",
"Promotional": "Selling, superlative-heavy"
}
},
"strongest_element": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What is the strongest thing about this draft?",
"criteria": {
"The opening": "It earns the next sentence",
"The structure": "It is easy to navigate and follow",
"The evidence": "Claims are supported by specifics",
"The voice": "It sounds like a person with a point of view",
"The ending": "It lands and tells you what to do",
"Nothing": "No element stands out yet"
}
},
"would_finish": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Would an average reader finish this?",
"criteria": {
"true": "They would read to the end",
"false": "They would stop partway"
}
},
"has_filler": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this contain sentences that could be deleted without losing meaning?"
},
"says_something": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this make a specific claim a reader could disagree with?",
"criteria": {
"true": "It takes a position or states a checkable fact",
"false": "It is unobjectionable and could have been written about anything"
}
}
}
}Nove respostas tipadas, uma requisição, cerca de meio segundo. Escolha uma lente ou escreva suas próprias perguntas.