Bez najmniejszego wysiłku
Czytelnik doczyta: Prawdopodobnie · Gęstość żargonu: Prosty język od początku do końca
Dziewięć odczytów szkicu, zanim go wyślesz.
Czytelnik doczyta: Prawdopodobnie · Gęstość żargonu: Prosty język od początku do końca
Dziewięć odczytów szkicu, zanim go wyślesz.
你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我
Czy ktoś czytający pierwszy raz wie, co jest powiedziane.
Modne słowa na akapit.
Jedyna miara zaangażowania, która się liczy.
Konkretne twierdzenia kontra abstrakcje.
Ile wykształcenia zakłada tekst.
Głos, który słyszy czytelnik.
To, co już działa.
Zdania, które można usunąć bez straty.
Czy twierdzi się cokolwiek, z czym da się nie zgodzić.
Każdy z linkiem może go zobaczyć, a on pojawia się w Przeglądaj.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"clarity": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How clear is this writing to a first-time reader?",
"criteria": [
"Impenetrable",
"Needs re-reading",
"Followable with effort",
"Clear",
"Effortless"
]
},
"concreteness": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How concrete and specific is this writing?",
"criteria": [
"Pure abstraction, no specifics at all",
"Mostly general claims",
"A mix of specifics and generalities",
"Mostly specific",
"Every claim is grounded in a specific detail"
]
},
"jargon": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How heavy is the jargon and buzzword usage?",
"criteria": [
"Plain language throughout",
"Occasional industry terms",
"Noticeably jargon-heavy",
"Dense with buzzwords",
"Almost entirely buzzwords"
]
},
"reading_level": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "What reading level does this writing assume?",
"criteria": [
"Primary school",
"Middle school",
"High school",
"Undergraduate",
"Specialist or academic"
]
},
"register": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What voice is this written in?",
"criteria": {
"Conversational": "Sounds like a person talking to you",
"Professional": "Polished and neutral",
"Corporate": "Institutional, hedged, committee-written",
"Academic": "Formal, citation-shaped, careful",
"Promotional": "Selling, superlative-heavy"
}
},
"strongest_element": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What is the strongest thing about this draft?",
"criteria": {
"The opening": "It earns the next sentence",
"The structure": "It is easy to navigate and follow",
"The evidence": "Claims are supported by specifics",
"The voice": "It sounds like a person with a point of view",
"The ending": "It lands and tells you what to do",
"Nothing": "No element stands out yet"
}
},
"would_finish": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Would an average reader finish this?",
"criteria": {
"true": "They would read to the end",
"false": "They would stop partway"
}
},
"has_filler": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this contain sentences that could be deleted without losing meaning?"
},
"says_something": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this make a specific claim a reader could disagree with?",
"criteria": {
"true": "It takes a position or states a checkable fact",
"false": "It is unobjectionable and could have been written about anything"
}
}
}
}Dziewięć typowanych odpowiedzi, jedno żądanie, około pół sekundy. Wybierz soczewkę albo napisz własne pytania.