Alarmerend
Sensatie: Pure ophef · Clickbait: Vrijwel zeker
Hoe een nieuwsbericht wordt ingekaderd.
Sensatie: Pure ophef · Clickbait: Vrijwel zeker
Hoe een nieuwsbericht wordt ingekaderd.
震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。
De houding die de tekst tegenover zijn onderwerp inneemt.
Hoe ver de taal op de feiten vooruitloopt.
Of de kop informatie achterhoudt om de klik af te dwingen.
Genoemde bronnen en controleerbare feiten per bewering.
Of het betoogt of verslag doet.
«Deskundigen zeggen» telt niet.
Angst, verontwaardiging en hoop als overtuigingsmiddel.
Of het stuk waarmaakt wat het beloofde.
«Nu meteen» waar niets werkelijk aan tijd gebonden is.
Iedereen met de link kan hem zien, en hij verschijnt in Verkennen.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"framing": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
"criteria": {
"Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
"Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
"Critical": "Argues against the subject",
"Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
"Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
"Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
}
},
"sensationalism": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
"criteria": [
"Completely measured",
"Slightly heightened",
"Noticeably dramatic",
"Heavily sensationalised",
"Pure hype"
]
},
"evidence_density": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
"criteria": [
"No evidence at all",
"Vague appeals to authority",
"Some named sources",
"Specific, checkable claims",
"Fully sourced and quantified"
]
},
"is_clickbait": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
"false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
}
},
"is_opinion": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
},
"names_sources": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
"false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
}
},
"emotional_appeal": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
"criteria": [
"None — purely factual",
"Mild colouring",
"Clear emotional framing",
"Emotion carries the argument",
"Entirely an emotional appeal"
]
},
"headline_matches_body": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
},
"urgency_manufactured": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
}
}
}Negen getypeerde antwoorden, één verzoek, ongeveer een halve seconde. Kies een lens of schrijf je eigen vragen.