Sans le moindre effort
Le lecteur irait au bout : Probablement · Densité de jargon : Langue simple d’un bout à l’autre
Neuf lectures d’un brouillon, avant de l’envoyer.
Le lecteur irait au bout : Probablement · Densité de jargon : Langue simple d’un bout à l’autre
Neuf lectures d’un brouillon, avant de l’envoyer.
你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我
Si un lecteur qui découvre le texte sait ce qui est dit.
Mots à la mode par paragraphe.
La seule mesure d’engagement qui compte.
Affirmations précises contre abstractions.
Le niveau d’études que la prose présuppose.
La voix que le lecteur entend.
Ce qui fonctionne déjà.
Des phrases supprimables sans rien perdre.
Si quoi que ce soit de réfutable est avancé.
Toute personne disposant du lien peut la voir, et elle apparaît dans Explorer.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"clarity": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How clear is this writing to a first-time reader?",
"criteria": [
"Impenetrable",
"Needs re-reading",
"Followable with effort",
"Clear",
"Effortless"
]
},
"concreteness": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How concrete and specific is this writing?",
"criteria": [
"Pure abstraction, no specifics at all",
"Mostly general claims",
"A mix of specifics and generalities",
"Mostly specific",
"Every claim is grounded in a specific detail"
]
},
"jargon": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How heavy is the jargon and buzzword usage?",
"criteria": [
"Plain language throughout",
"Occasional industry terms",
"Noticeably jargon-heavy",
"Dense with buzzwords",
"Almost entirely buzzwords"
]
},
"reading_level": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "What reading level does this writing assume?",
"criteria": [
"Primary school",
"Middle school",
"High school",
"Undergraduate",
"Specialist or academic"
]
},
"register": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What voice is this written in?",
"criteria": {
"Conversational": "Sounds like a person talking to you",
"Professional": "Polished and neutral",
"Corporate": "Institutional, hedged, committee-written",
"Academic": "Formal, citation-shaped, careful",
"Promotional": "Selling, superlative-heavy"
}
},
"strongest_element": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What is the strongest thing about this draft?",
"criteria": {
"The opening": "It earns the next sentence",
"The structure": "It is easy to navigate and follow",
"The evidence": "Claims are supported by specifics",
"The voice": "It sounds like a person with a point of view",
"The ending": "It lands and tells you what to do",
"Nothing": "No element stands out yet"
}
},
"would_finish": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Would an average reader finish this?",
"criteria": {
"true": "They would read to the end",
"false": "They would stop partway"
}
},
"has_filler": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this contain sentences that could be deleted without losing meaning?"
},
"says_something": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this make a specific claim a reader could disagree with?",
"criteria": {
"true": "It takes a position or states a checkable fact",
"false": "It is unobjectionable and could have been written about anything"
}
}
}
}Neuf réponses typées, une requête, environ une demi-seconde. Choisissez une lentille ou écrivez vos propres questions.