草稿評閱

毫不費力

讀者會讀完:多半是 · 行話密度:通篇大白話

寄出去之前,對這份草稿的九項解讀。

Jev 讀到的 state

你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我

9
問題
1
次請求
203 毫秒
往返耗時
1,035
輸入 token
US$0.000043
費用
jev-1.13.0
模型

領銜的幾則解讀

清晰度

Score

第一次讀的人知不知道它在說什麼。

64%
3.57 滿分 4 · 毫不費力

行話密度

Score

每段裡的流行詞數量。

89%
0.14 滿分 4 · 通篇大白話

讀者會讀完

Noul

唯一重要的參與度指標。

多半是
答案為「是」的機率
83%
擲硬幣

同一次請求裡的其餘部分

具體程度

Score

具體主張對抗抽象說辭。

72%
3.29 滿分 4 · 大多很具體

閱讀門檻

Score

這段文字假定讀者受過多少教育。

85%
2.88 滿分 4 · 大學

語域

Choice

讀者聽到的那把嗓音。

99%
口語化 佔 100%,共 5 個選項
100% 口語化

最強的部分

Choice

哪裡已經奏效了。

50%
結尾 佔 58%,共 6 個選項
58% 結尾

含有廢話

Noul

刪掉也不損失什麼的句子。

多半是
答案為「是」的機率
87%
擲硬幣

提出了真主張

Noul

有沒有斷言任何可被證偽的東西。

幾乎肯定是
答案為「是」的機率
96%
擲硬幣

分享這則解讀

拿到連結的人都看得到,而且會出現在「瀏覽」裡。

發到 X
產生這則結果的確切請求

POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone

{
  "state": "你好,我觉得你这个论文完全不行。虽然本科毕业论文我不该要求太高,但是你:1. 表格没有标题 2. 字体不一致 3. 参考文献时有时无,格式不统一 4. 第三章的实验和第四章看起来没一点关系 我给你的结果标注了,你下周三之前改完发给我",
  "model": "jev-latest",
  "questions": {
    "clarity": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How clear is this writing to a first-time reader?",
      "criteria": [
        "Impenetrable",
        "Needs re-reading",
        "Followable with effort",
        "Clear",
        "Effortless"
      ]
    },
    "concreteness": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How concrete and specific is this writing?",
      "criteria": [
        "Pure abstraction, no specifics at all",
        "Mostly general claims",
        "A mix of specifics and generalities",
        "Mostly specific",
        "Every claim is grounded in a specific detail"
      ]
    },
    "jargon": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How heavy is the jargon and buzzword usage?",
      "criteria": [
        "Plain language throughout",
        "Occasional industry terms",
        "Noticeably jargon-heavy",
        "Dense with buzzwords",
        "Almost entirely buzzwords"
      ]
    },
    "reading_level": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "What reading level does this writing assume?",
      "criteria": [
        "Primary school",
        "Middle school",
        "High school",
        "Undergraduate",
        "Specialist or academic"
      ]
    },
    "register": {
      "type": "choice",
      "instructions": "What voice is this written in?",
      "criteria": {
        "Conversational": "Sounds like a person talking to you",
        "Professional": "Polished and neutral",
        "Corporate": "Institutional, hedged, committee-written",
        "Academic": "Formal, citation-shaped, careful",
        "Promotional": "Selling, superlative-heavy"
      }
    },
    "strongest_element": {
      "type": "choice",
      "instructions": "What is the strongest thing about this draft?",
      "criteria": {
        "The opening": "It earns the next sentence",
        "The structure": "It is easy to navigate and follow",
        "The evidence": "Claims are supported by specifics",
        "The voice": "It sounds like a person with a point of view",
        "The ending": "It lands and tells you what to do",
        "Nothing": "No element stands out yet"
      }
    },
    "would_finish": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Would an average reader finish this?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "They would read to the end",
        "false": "They would stop partway"
      }
    },
    "has_filler": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does this contain sentences that could be deleted without losing meaning?"
    },
    "says_something": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does this make a specific claim a reader could disagree with?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "It takes a position or states a checkable fact",
        "false": "It is unobjectionable and could have been written about anything"
      }
    }
  }
}

把 Jev 指向你自己的文字

九個型別化答案,一次請求,大約半秒。挑一個鏡頭,或者自己寫問題。