標題鏡頭

危言聳聽

聳動程度:純粹炒作 · 標題黨:幾乎肯定是

一則新聞是被怎麼框起來的。

Jev 讀到的 state

震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。

9
問題
1
次請求
270 毫秒
往返耗時
857
輸入 token
US$0.000036
費用
jev-1.13.0
模型

領銜的幾則解讀

框架

Choice

文字對其主題所採取的立場。

100%
危言聳聽 佔 100%,共 6 個選項
100% 危言聳聽

聳動程度

Score

語言比事實跑出去多遠。

74%
3.69 滿分 4 · 純粹炒作

標題黨

Noul

標題是不是靠藏著不說來逼你點進去。

幾乎肯定是
答案為「是」的機率
96%
擲硬幣

同一次請求裡的其餘部分

證據密度

Score

每個主張背後有多少具名來源和可查證的事實。

97%
0.96 滿分 4 · 含糊地訴諸權威

是評論而非報導

Noul

它在論證還是在報導。

多半是
答案為「是」的機率
86%
擲硬幣

點名來源

Noul

「專家稱」不算數。

幾乎肯定不是
答案為「是」的機率
4%
擲硬幣

情緒訴求

Score

把恐懼、憤怒和希望當作說服手段。

66%
3.59 滿分 4 · 完全是一次情緒訴求

標題與內文相符

Noul

文章有沒有兌現它承諾的東西。

多半不是
答案為「是」的機率
15%
擲硬幣

製造出來的急迫感

Noul

明明不限時,卻說「就是現在」。

多半是
答案為「是」的機率
86%
擲硬幣

分享這則解讀

拿到連結的人都看得到,而且會出現在「瀏覽」裡。

發到 X
產生這則結果的確切請求

POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone

{
  "state": "震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。",
  "model": "jev-latest",
  "questions": {
    "framing": {
      "type": "choice",
      "instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
      "criteria": {
        "Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
        "Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
        "Critical": "Argues against the subject",
        "Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
        "Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
        "Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
      }
    },
    "sensationalism": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
      "criteria": [
        "Completely measured",
        "Slightly heightened",
        "Noticeably dramatic",
        "Heavily sensationalised",
        "Pure hype"
      ]
    },
    "evidence_density": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
      "criteria": [
        "No evidence at all",
        "Vague appeals to authority",
        "Some named sources",
        "Specific, checkable claims",
        "Fully sourced and quantified"
      ]
    },
    "is_clickbait": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
        "false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
      }
    },
    "is_opinion": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
    },
    "names_sources": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
        "false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
      }
    },
    "emotional_appeal": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
      "criteria": [
        "None — purely factual",
        "Mild colouring",
        "Clear emotional framing",
        "Emotion carries the argument",
        "Entirely an emotional appeal"
      ]
    },
    "headline_matches_body": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
    },
    "urgency_manufactured": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
    }
  }
}

把 Jev 指向你自己的文字

九個型別化答案,一次請求,大約半秒。挑一個鏡頭,或者自己寫問題。