中立
聳動程度:明顯戲劇化 · 標題黨:偏向否
一則新聞是被怎麼框起來的。
聳動程度:明顯戲劇化 · 標題黨:偏向否
一則新聞是被怎麼框起來的。
认识几个 00 后一年干三千万起步的,还真都是互联网😂干的都是k12 教培 05 年入百万的认识俩 一个干东南亚跨境电商 一个依旧 k12 教培 三四年前还有个 19 岁年入两千万的人才,当时震惊整个国内 k12 数学圈 币圈有个 05 的不说了 至于灰产 24 年十月我曾接触过无人机零配件外贸业务 (虽然零配件外贸出去用途大家都能猜到,但这算灰产吗?) 当时知道三个年轻人,两男一女,没有一个大于二十一岁 他们在珠海航展拉客户做居间,每笔居间费最低五十万起 其中那个女生还撮合了笔香港老板的投资 FA 佣金拿了两百万
文字對其主題所採取的立場。
語言比事實跑出去多遠。
標題是不是靠藏著不說來逼你點進去。
每個主張背後有多少具名來源和可查證的事實。
它在論證還是在報導。
「專家稱」不算數。
把恐懼、憤怒和希望當作說服手段。
文章有沒有兌現它承諾的東西。
明明不限時,卻說「就是現在」。
拿到連結的人都看得到,而且會出現在「瀏覽」裡。
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "认识几个 00 后一年干三千万起步的,还真都是互联网😂干的都是k12 教培 05 年入百万的认识俩 一个干东南亚跨境电商 一个依旧 k12 教培 三四年前还有个 19 岁年入两千万的人才,当时震惊整个国内 k12 数学圈 币圈有个 05 的不说了 至于灰产 24 年十月我曾接触过无人机零配件外贸业务 (虽然零配件外贸出去用途大家都能猜到,但这算灰产吗?) 当时知道三个年轻人,两男一女,没有一个…",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"framing": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
"criteria": {
"Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
"Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
"Critical": "Argues against the subject",
"Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
"Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
"Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
}
},
"sensationalism": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
"criteria": [
"Completely measured",
"Slightly heightened",
"Noticeably dramatic",
"Heavily sensationalised",
"Pure hype"
]
},
"evidence_density": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
"criteria": [
"No evidence at all",
"Vague appeals to authority",
"Some named sources",
"Specific, checkable claims",
"Fully sourced and quantified"
]
},
"is_clickbait": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
"false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
}
},
"is_opinion": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
},
"names_sources": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
"false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
}
},
"emotional_appeal": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
"criteria": [
"None — purely factual",
"Mild colouring",
"Clear emotional framing",
"Emotion carries the argument",
"Entirely an emotional appeal"
]
},
"headline_matches_body": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
},
"urgency_manufactured": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
}
}
}