草稿評閱

費點勁跟得上

讀者會讀完:確實說不準 · 行話密度:幾乎全是流行詞

寄出去之前,對這份草稿的九項解讀。

Jev 讀到的 state

我们激动地宣布,本平台现已引入业界领先的 AI 驱动编排层,使各类组织能够在其数据资产版图中释放前所未有的协同效应。借助新一代机器学习的力量,客户可以规模化地驱动变革性成果。欢迎联系我们,了解我们如何在您的数字化旅程中携手同行。

9
問題
1
次請求
508 毫秒
往返耗時
1,031
輸入 token
US$0.000043
費用
jev-1.13.0
模型

領銜的幾則解讀

清晰度

Score

第一次讀的人知不知道它在說什麼。

65%
1.68 滿分 4 · 費點勁跟得上

行話密度

Score

每段裡的流行詞數量。

84%
3.81 滿分 4 · 幾乎全是流行詞

讀者會讀完

Noul

唯一重要的參與度指標。

確實說不準
接近擲硬幣——別只憑這一個分支
51%
擲硬幣

同一次請求裡的其餘部分

具體程度

Score

具體主張對抗抽象說辭。

61%
0.47 滿分 4 · 純抽象,完全沒有細節

閱讀門檻

Score

這段文字假定讀者受過多少教育。

84%
3.11 滿分 4 · 大學

語域

Choice

讀者聽到的那把嗓音。

97%
推銷腔 佔 98%,共 5 個選項
98% 推銷腔

最強的部分

Choice

哪裡已經奏效了。

47%
結尾 佔 56%,共 6 個選項
56% 結尾

含有廢話

Noul

刪掉也不損失什麼的句子。

多半是
答案為「是」的機率
83%
擲硬幣

提出了真主張

Noul

有沒有斷言任何可被證偽的東西。

多半是
答案為「是」的機率
77%
擲硬幣

分享這則解讀

拿到連結的人都看得到,而且會出現在「瀏覽」裡。

發到 X
產生這則結果的確切請求

POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone

{
  "state": "我们激动地宣布,本平台现已引入业界领先的 AI 驱动编排层,使各类组织能够在其数据资产版图中释放前所未有的协同效应。借助新一代机器学习的力量,客户可以规模化地驱动变革性成果。欢迎联系我们,了解我们如何在您的数字化旅程中携手同行。",
  "model": "jev-latest",
  "questions": {
    "clarity": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How clear is this writing to a first-time reader?",
      "criteria": [
        "Impenetrable",
        "Needs re-reading",
        "Followable with effort",
        "Clear",
        "Effortless"
      ]
    },
    "concreteness": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How concrete and specific is this writing?",
      "criteria": [
        "Pure abstraction, no specifics at all",
        "Mostly general claims",
        "A mix of specifics and generalities",
        "Mostly specific",
        "Every claim is grounded in a specific detail"
      ]
    },
    "jargon": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "How heavy is the jargon and buzzword usage?",
      "criteria": [
        "Plain language throughout",
        "Occasional industry terms",
        "Noticeably jargon-heavy",
        "Dense with buzzwords",
        "Almost entirely buzzwords"
      ]
    },
    "reading_level": {
      "type": "score",
      "instructions": "What reading level does this writing assume?",
      "criteria": [
        "Primary school",
        "Middle school",
        "High school",
        "Undergraduate",
        "Specialist or academic"
      ]
    },
    "register": {
      "type": "choice",
      "instructions": "What voice is this written in?",
      "criteria": {
        "Conversational": "Sounds like a person talking to you",
        "Professional": "Polished and neutral",
        "Corporate": "Institutional, hedged, committee-written",
        "Academic": "Formal, citation-shaped, careful",
        "Promotional": "Selling, superlative-heavy"
      }
    },
    "strongest_element": {
      "type": "choice",
      "instructions": "What is the strongest thing about this draft?",
      "criteria": {
        "The opening": "It earns the next sentence",
        "The structure": "It is easy to navigate and follow",
        "The evidence": "Claims are supported by specifics",
        "The voice": "It sounds like a person with a point of view",
        "The ending": "It lands and tells you what to do",
        "Nothing": "No element stands out yet"
      }
    },
    "would_finish": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Would an average reader finish this?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "They would read to the end",
        "false": "They would stop partway"
      }
    },
    "has_filler": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does this contain sentences that could be deleted without losing meaning?"
    },
    "says_something": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "Does this make a specific claim a reader could disagree with?",
      "criteria": {
        "true": "It takes a position or states a checkable fact",
        "false": "It is unobjectionable and could have been written about anything"
      }
    }
  }
}

把 Jev 指向你自己的文字

九個型別化答案,一次請求,大約半秒。挑一個鏡頭,或者自己寫問題。