推崇
聳動程度:明顯戲劇化 · 標題黨:偏向否
一則新聞是被怎麼框起來的。
聳動程度:明顯戲劇化 · 標題黨:偏向否
一則新聞是被怎麼框起來的。
兄弟们,公众号订阅这个事真别嫌土。 我昨天随手测了个小号,单日 1280,最离谱的是阅读没爆,钱先到账了。 我找了几个真能用的工具,别瞎找了: 1、句易网 http://ju1.cn 发之前扫敏感词,不然你辛苦写完直接凉。 2、新榜热点 https://newrank.cn 看同赛道什么题在涨,别靠脑补选题。 3、5118 https://5118.com 挖长尾词,标题党不是乱写,是有数据的。 4、壹伴助手 https://yiban.io 排版、采集、素材管理一把梭。 我自己试下来,公众号最难的不是写,是别天天闭门造车。 能抄作业的地方先抄框架,别抄文字,不然号死得很冤。
文字對其主題所採取的立場。
語言比事實跑出去多遠。
標題是不是靠藏著不說來逼你點進去。
每個主張背後有多少具名來源和可查證的事實。
它在論證還是在報導。
「專家稱」不算數。
把恐懼、憤怒和希望當作說服手段。
文章有沒有兌現它承諾的東西。
明明不限時,卻說「就是現在」。
拿到連結的人都看得到,而且會出現在「瀏覽」裡。
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "兄弟们,公众号订阅这个事真别嫌土。 我昨天随手测了个小号,单日 1280,最离谱的是阅读没爆,钱先到账了。 我找了几个真能用的工具,别瞎找了: 1、句易网 http://ju1.cn 发之前扫敏感词,不然你辛苦写完直接凉。 2、新榜热点 https://newrank.cn 看同赛道什么题在涨,别靠脑补选题。 3、5118 https://5118.com 挖长尾词,标题党不是乱写,是有数据的。…",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"framing": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
"criteria": {
"Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
"Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
"Critical": "Argues against the subject",
"Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
"Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
"Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
}
},
"sensationalism": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
"criteria": [
"Completely measured",
"Slightly heightened",
"Noticeably dramatic",
"Heavily sensationalised",
"Pure hype"
]
},
"evidence_density": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
"criteria": [
"No evidence at all",
"Vague appeals to authority",
"Some named sources",
"Specific, checkable claims",
"Fully sourced and quantified"
]
},
"is_clickbait": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
"false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
}
},
"is_opinion": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
},
"names_sources": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
"false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
}
},
"emotional_appeal": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
"criteria": [
"None — purely factual",
"Mild colouring",
"Clear emotional framing",
"Emotion carries the argument",
"Entirely an emotional appeal"
]
},
"headline_matches_body": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
},
"urgency_manufactured": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
}
}
}