Alarmist
Sensationalism: Pure hype · Clickbait: Almost certainly
How a piece of news is being framed.
Sensationalism: Pure hype · Clickbait: Almost certainly
How a piece of news is being framed.
震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。
The stance the text takes toward its subject.
How far the language outruns the facts.
Whether the headline withholds to force the click.
Named sources and checkable facts per claim.
Whether it argues or reports.
"Experts say" does not count.
Fear, outrage, and hope as persuasion.
Whether the piece delivers what it promised.
"Right now" where nothing is actually time-bound.
Anyone with the link can see it, and it appears in Explore.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"framing": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
"criteria": {
"Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
"Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
"Critical": "Argues against the subject",
"Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
"Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
"Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
}
},
"sensationalism": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
"criteria": [
"Completely measured",
"Slightly heightened",
"Noticeably dramatic",
"Heavily sensationalised",
"Pure hype"
]
},
"evidence_density": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
"criteria": [
"No evidence at all",
"Vague appeals to authority",
"Some named sources",
"Specific, checkable claims",
"Fully sourced and quantified"
]
},
"is_clickbait": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
"false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
}
},
"is_opinion": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
},
"names_sources": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
"false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
}
},
"emotional_appeal": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
"criteria": [
"None — purely factual",
"Mild colouring",
"Clear emotional framing",
"Emotion carries the argument",
"Entirely an emotional appeal"
]
},
"headline_matches_body": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
},
"urgency_manufactured": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
}
}
}Nine typed answers, one request, about half a second. Pick a lens or write your own questions.