Perlu dibaca semula
Pembaca akan menghabiskannya: Berkemungkinan besar tidak · Ketumpatan jargon: Padat dengan kata kunci gaya
Sembilan bacaan atas satu draf, sebelum anda menghantarnya.
Pembaca akan menghabiskannya: Berkemungkinan besar tidak · Ketumpatan jargon: Padat dengan kata kunci gaya
Sembilan bacaan atas satu draf, sebelum anda menghantarnya.
发生了什么: @aleyda 转发 @CyrusShepard 对 130+ 从业者的调研(9/18):品牌信任与 parametric memory 权重大于 chunking / llms.txt;可引用的原始数据胜泛文;传统可抓取/可排名与 AI 可见高度重叠。@lilyraynyc 在深圳场强调:改叙事要打全表面,Reddit 单人长帖就能毁品牌在模型里的画像;有 Knowledge Panel 可即时验证 Google 资料。GSC 同时被「伪对话式 prompt 追踪词」刷屏。
Sama ada pembaca kali pertama tahu apa yang sedang dikatakan.
Kata kunci gaya setiap perenggan.
Satu-satunya metrik penglibatan yang penting.
Dakwaan khusus berbanding abstraksi.
Berapa tinggi pendidikan yang diandaikan prosa itu.
Suara yang didengar pembaca.
Apa yang sudah berkesan.
Ayat yang boleh dipadam tanpa kehilangan apa-apa.
Sama ada ada apa-apa yang boleh disangkal sedang ditegaskan.
Sesiapa yang ada pautannya boleh melihatnya, dan ia muncul dalam Terokai.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "发生了什么: @aleyda 转发 @CyrusShepard 对 130+ 从业者的调研(9/18):品牌信任与 parametric memory 权重大于 chunking / llms.txt;可引用的原始数据胜泛文;传统可抓取/可排名与 AI 可见高度重叠。@lilyraynyc 在深圳场强调:改叙事要打全表面,Reddit 单人长帖就能毁品牌在模型里的画像;有 Knowledge P…",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"clarity": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How clear is this writing to a first-time reader?",
"criteria": [
"Impenetrable",
"Needs re-reading",
"Followable with effort",
"Clear",
"Effortless"
]
},
"concreteness": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How concrete and specific is this writing?",
"criteria": [
"Pure abstraction, no specifics at all",
"Mostly general claims",
"A mix of specifics and generalities",
"Mostly specific",
"Every claim is grounded in a specific detail"
]
},
"jargon": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How heavy is the jargon and buzzword usage?",
"criteria": [
"Plain language throughout",
"Occasional industry terms",
"Noticeably jargon-heavy",
"Dense with buzzwords",
"Almost entirely buzzwords"
]
},
"reading_level": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "What reading level does this writing assume?",
"criteria": [
"Primary school",
"Middle school",
"High school",
"Undergraduate",
"Specialist or academic"
]
},
"register": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What voice is this written in?",
"criteria": {
"Conversational": "Sounds like a person talking to you",
"Professional": "Polished and neutral",
"Corporate": "Institutional, hedged, committee-written",
"Academic": "Formal, citation-shaped, careful",
"Promotional": "Selling, superlative-heavy"
}
},
"strongest_element": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "What is the strongest thing about this draft?",
"criteria": {
"The opening": "It earns the next sentence",
"The structure": "It is easy to navigate and follow",
"The evidence": "Claims are supported by specifics",
"The voice": "It sounds like a person with a point of view",
"The ending": "It lands and tells you what to do",
"Nothing": "No element stands out yet"
}
},
"would_finish": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Would an average reader finish this?",
"criteria": {
"true": "They would read to the end",
"false": "They would stop partway"
}
},
"has_filler": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this contain sentences that could be deleted without losing meaning?"
},
"says_something": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does this make a specific claim a reader could disagree with?",
"criteria": {
"true": "It takes a position or states a checkable fact",
"false": "It is unobjectionable and could have been written about anything"
}
}
}
}Sembilan jawapan bertaip, satu permintaan, lebih kurang setengah saat. Pilih kanta atau tulis soalan anda sendiri.