Alarmista
Sensacionalismo: Muy sensacionalista · Cebo de clics: Se inclina a no
Cómo se está encuadrando una noticia.
Sensacionalismo: Muy sensacionalista · Cebo de clics: Se inclina a no
Cómo se está encuadrando una noticia.
我感觉好恐怖。 男朋友帮我搞新加坡水硕的事情,我从头到尾没给他任何材料,他连我真名都不知道。 结果他今天突然来一句: “你上学的时候成绩还蛮好的诶。” 我:????? 握草??? 你他妈哪里来的我上学成绩??? 他说:这些信息都能查到啊,一下就调出来了。 我:??????? 脑子里突然闪过一个非常恐怖的问题: 那我以前开房记录你岂不是也能查到? 他说: “我看到了啊,你一年三百多天,一百多天都在住酒店。” 我:………………………… 尼玛。 握草了。 一时间甚至不知道该先震惊哪一件事。 只能说网上天天讲什么“信息安全”“保护隐私”,我还觉得离我挺远。 现在的感觉是: 人是没有隐私的,只是暂时没人想查。 最恐怖的是他最后特别淡定地跟我说: “没事啊,我又不认识以前的你。你以前干过什么跟我都没关系。” 然后停了一下: “9 月 25 号以后的事情,你别骗我就行。” 我:好的。 这下好了。 这下不是坦诚相待了。 这是数据库直接打通了。 彻底老实了。
La postura que toma el texto ante su tema.
Cuánto se adelanta el lenguaje a los hechos.
Si el titular oculta información para forzar el clic.
Fuentes con nombre y datos verificables por afirmación.
Si argumenta o si informa.
«Los expertos dicen» no cuenta.
Miedo, indignación y esperanza como persuasión.
Si la pieza cumple lo que prometió.
«Ahora mismo» donde en realidad nada depende del tiempo.
Cualquiera con el enlace puede verla, y aparece en Explorar.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "我感觉好恐怖。 男朋友帮我搞新加坡水硕的事情,我从头到尾没给他任何材料,他连我真名都不知道。 结果他今天突然来一句: “你上学的时候成绩还蛮好的诶。” 我:????? 握草??? 你他妈哪里来的我上学成绩??? 他说:这些信息都能查到啊,一下就调出来了。 我:??????? 脑子里突然闪过一个非常恐怖的问题: 那我以前开房记录你岂不是也能查到? 他说: “我看到了啊,你一年三百多天,一百多天都在…",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"framing": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
"criteria": {
"Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
"Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
"Critical": "Argues against the subject",
"Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
"Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
"Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
}
},
"sensationalism": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
"criteria": [
"Completely measured",
"Slightly heightened",
"Noticeably dramatic",
"Heavily sensationalised",
"Pure hype"
]
},
"evidence_density": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
"criteria": [
"No evidence at all",
"Vague appeals to authority",
"Some named sources",
"Specific, checkable claims",
"Fully sourced and quantified"
]
},
"is_clickbait": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
"false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
}
},
"is_opinion": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
},
"names_sources": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
"false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
}
},
"emotional_appeal": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
"criteria": [
"None — purely factual",
"Mild colouring",
"Clear emotional framing",
"Emotion carries the argument",
"Entirely an emotional appeal"
]
},
"headline_matches_body": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
},
"urgency_manufactured": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
}
}
}Nueve respuestas tipadas, una petición, medio segundo aproximadamente. Elige una lente o escribe tus propias preguntas.