Alarmistisk
Sensationalisme: Ren hype · Clickbait: Næsten med sikkerhed
Hvordan en nyhed bliver rammesat.
Sensationalisme: Ren hype · Clickbait: Næsten med sikkerhed
Hvordan en nyhed bliver rammesat.
震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。
Den holdning, teksten indtager til sit emne.
Hvor langt sproget løber forud for kendsgerningerne.
Om overskriften holder tilbage for at fremtvinge klikket.
Navngivne kilder og kontrollerbare fakta pr. påstand.
Om den argumenterer eller refererer.
„Eksperter siger“ tæller ikke.
Frygt, forargelse og håb som overtalelse.
Om stykket leverer det, det lovede.
„Lige nu“, hvor intet faktisk er tidsbundet.
Alle med linket kan se den, og den vises i Udforsk.
POST https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone
{
"state": "震惊:科学家称这件厨房里的常见物品可能正在悄悄摧毁你的健康——而大企业不想让你知道。一项突破性新研究让专家们目瞪口呆,对数百万家庭每天都在使用的东西提出了紧迫的疑问。据称医生们正把这一发现称为一记警钟。",
"model": "jev-latest",
"questions": {
"framing": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "How is this piece framed?",
"criteria": {
"Neutral": "Reports without taking a side",
"Promotional": "Advocates for the subject",
"Critical": "Argues against the subject",
"Alarmist": "Emphasises danger and urgency",
"Opinion": "Openly argues a personal position",
"Explanatory": "Teaches the reader how something works"
}
},
"sensationalism": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How sensationalised is the language?",
"criteria": [
"Completely measured",
"Slightly heightened",
"Noticeably dramatic",
"Heavily sensationalised",
"Pure hype"
]
},
"evidence_density": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much verifiable evidence does the text offer?",
"criteria": [
"No evidence at all",
"Vague appeals to authority",
"Some named sources",
"Specific, checkable claims",
"Fully sourced and quantified"
]
},
"is_clickbait": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this clickbait?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Withholds the actual information to force a click",
"false": "The headline tells you what the piece says"
}
},
"is_opinion": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is this opinion writing rather than reporting?"
},
"names_sources": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the text name specific, identifiable sources?",
"criteria": {
"true": "Named people, institutions, or studies",
"false": "Only anonymous or vague attributions such as \"experts say\""
}
},
"emotional_appeal": {
"type": "score",
"instructions": "How much does the piece rely on emotional appeal?",
"criteria": [
"None — purely factual",
"Mild colouring",
"Clear emotional framing",
"Emotion carries the argument",
"Entirely an emotional appeal"
]
},
"headline_matches_body": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Does the body support what the headline claims?"
},
"urgency_manufactured": {
"type": "noul",
"instructions": "Is the urgency in this piece manufactured rather than real?"
}
}
}Ni typede svar, én forespørgsel, cirka et halvt sekund. Vælg en linse, eller skriv dine egne spørgsmål.